Screener
IXG vs BCFN
iShares Global Financials ETF vs Baron Financials ETF
Key differences
- IXG costs 0.39% less per year.
- IXG is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXG | BCFN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $541M | $48M |
| Since | 2001 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.67% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.47% | -20.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXG and BCFN
Explore further