Screener
IXG vs EUFN
iShares Global Financials ETF vs iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
Key differences
- IXG costs 0.08% less per year.
- EUFN is significantly larger than IXG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EUFN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXG | EUFN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $541M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2001 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 3.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +31.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +18.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.67% | 19.58% |
| Max drawdown | -43.47% | -53.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXG and EUFN
Explore further