Screener
IXJ vs XHS
iShares Global Healthcare ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF
Key differences
- XHS costs 0.05% less per year.
- IXJ is significantly larger than XHS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XHS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXJ | XHS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.6B | $98M |
| Since | 2001 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 0.26% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +9.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +1.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | 0.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.46% | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -27.35% | -39.32% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXJ and XHS
Explore further