Screener
IXN vs BPAY
iShares Global Tech ETF vs iShares FinTech Active ETF
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.16% less per year.
- IXN is significantly larger than BPAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXN is classified as equity, while BPAY is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IXN follows a index tracking strategy; BPAY uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IXN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXN | BPAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $9M |
| Since | 2001 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.5% | -5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.5% | +9.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.36 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.62% | 25.59% |
| Max drawdown | -36.30% | -33.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXN and BPAY
Explore further