Screener
IXN vs IHF
iShares Global Tech ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
Key differences
- IXN is significantly larger than IHF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXN covers global markets; IHF covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IXN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXN | IHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $777M |
| Since | 2001 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.5% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.5% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.1% | -0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.62% | 21.56% |
| Max drawdown | -36.30% | -35.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXN and IHF
Explore further