Screener
IXN vs THNQ
iShares Global Tech ETF vs Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.29% less per year.
- IXN is significantly larger than THNQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, THNQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXN | THNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $322M |
| Since | 2001 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.5% | +68.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.5% | +38.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.1% | +17.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.62% | 25.96% |
| Max drawdown | -36.30% | -50.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXN and THNQ
Explore further