Screener
IXUS vs BDYN
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.33% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than BDYN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXUS is classified as equity, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- IXUS follows a index tracking strategy; BDYN uses active selection.
- IXUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXUS | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56.2B | $2.7B |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.28% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.22% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXUS and BDYN
Explore further