Screener
IXUS vs IXJ
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF vs iShares Global Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.33% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than IXJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IXUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXUS | IXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56.2B | $3.6B |
| Since | 2012 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.28% | 14.45% |
| Max drawdown | -36.22% | -27.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXUS and IXJ
Explore further