Screener
IXUS vs YJUN
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF vs FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.83% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than YJUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXUS is classified as equity, while YJUN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IXUS covers global ex us markets; YJUN covers global.
- IXUS follows a index tracking strategy; YJUN uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, IXUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXUS | YJUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56.2B | $131M |
| Since | 2012 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.7% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.40% | 6.88% |
| Max drawdown | -36.22% | -21.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXUS and YJUN
Explore further