Screener
IYH vs BMED
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF vs iShares Health Innovation Active ETF
Key differences
- IYH costs 0.17% less per year.
- IYH is significantly larger than BMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYH follows a index tracking strategy; BMED uses active selection.
- IYH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYH | BMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $10M |
| Since | 2000 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.22 | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.63% | 14.94% |
| Max drawdown | -28.40% | -36.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYH and BMED
Explore further