Screener
IYLD vs HIMU
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
- HIMU costs 0.11% less per year.
- HIMU is significantly larger than IYLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYLD is classified as mixed asset, while HIMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- IYLD follows a active selection strategy; HIMU uses index tracking.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYLD | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2012 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.55% | 5.16% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.3% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.76% | 4.92% |
| Max drawdown | -30.23% | -8.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYLD and HIMU
Explore further