Screener
IYM vs ICOP
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF vs iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Key differences
- IYM costs 0.09% less per year.
- IYM is significantly larger than ICOP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYM | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $429M |
| Since | 2000 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.5% | +94.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.63% | 36.85% |
| Max drawdown | -42.76% | -38.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYM and ICOP
Explore further