Screener
IYM vs PSCM
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
Key differences
- PSCM costs 0.09% less per year.
- IYM is significantly larger than PSCM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSCM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYM | PSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $21M |
| Since | 2000 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.5% | +58.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.63% | 23.94% |
| Max drawdown | -42.76% | -51.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYM and PSCM
Explore further