Screener
IYW vs BMED
iShares U.S. Technology ETF vs iShares Health Innovation Active ETF
Key differences
- IYW costs 0.17% less per year.
- IYW is significantly larger than BMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYW follows a index tracking strategy; BMED uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IYW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IYW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYW | BMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21.5B | $10M |
| Since | 2000 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +54.5% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.1% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.5% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.99% | 14.94% |
| Max drawdown | -39.44% | -36.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYW and BMED
Explore further