Screener
JAVA vs LCDS
JPMorgan Active Value ETF vs JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF
Key differences
- LCDS costs 0.14% less per year.
- JAVA is significantly larger than LCDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JAVA follows a active selection strategy; LCDS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| JAVA | LCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.4B | $15M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 0.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.9% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.30% | 11.81% |
| Max drawdown | -16.54% | -17.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JAVA and LCDS
Explore further