Screener
JEMA vs BBJP
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
Key differences
Both JEMA and BBJP are equity ETFs. JEMA charges 0.33% a year and BBJP 0.19%. The main difference: JEMA follows a active selection strategy; BBJP uses index tracking.
- JEMA follows a active selection strategy; BBJP uses index tracking.
- JEMA covers emerging markets; BBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- BBJP costs 0.14% less per year.
- BBJP is much larger than JEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, JEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| JEMA | BBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $17.4B |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 4.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.9% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.29% | 19.71% |
| Max drawdown | -39.50% | -32.66% |
Similar to JEMA and BBJP
Explore further