Screener
JGRW vs QINT
Jensen Quality Growth ETF vs American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
Key differences
- QINT costs 0.23% less per year.
- QINT is significantly larger than JGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JGRW covers north america markets; QINT covers global.
- JGRW follows a active selection strategy; QINT uses index tracking.
- QINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JGRW | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | $590M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 2.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.78% | 14.85% |
| Max drawdown | -14.63% | -33.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JGRW and QINT
Explore further