Screener
JHCR vs JHMU
JHancock Core Bond ETF vs John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- JHCR costs 0.10% less per year.
- JHCR is significantly larger than JHMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| JHCR | JHMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $43M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.19% | 3.88% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.6% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.22% | 2.82% |
| Max drawdown | -2.85% | -4.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JHCR and JHMU
Explore further