Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

JHMU vs JHCR

John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF vs JHancock Core Bond ETF

JHMU

John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF

John Hancock

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$43M

JHCR

JHancock Core Bond ETF

John Hancock

Annual cost

0.29%

Fund size

$2.2B

Key differences

  • JHCR costs 0.10% less per year.
  • JHCR is significantly larger than JHMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

JHMUJHCR
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.29%
Fund size (AUM)$43M$2.2B
Since20232024
Dividend yield3.88%4.19%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+6.7%+6.6%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y2.82%4.22%
Max drawdown-4.48%-2.85%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to JHMU and JHCR