Screener
JIG vs JAVA
JPMorgan International Growth ETF vs JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Key differences
- JAVA costs 0.11% less per year.
- JAVA is significantly larger than JIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JIG follows a index tracking strategy; JAVA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, JAVA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| JIG | JAVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $429M | $6.4B |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.04% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.5% | +23.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.34% | 11.30% |
| Max drawdown | -43.75% | -16.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JIG and JAVA
Explore further