Screener
JIG vs PJFV
JPMorgan International Growth ETF vs PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
Key differences
- JIG costs 0.20% less per year.
- JIG is significantly larger than PJFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JIG follows a index tracking strategy; PJFV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PJFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| JIG | PJFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $429M | $55M |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.04% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.5% | +36.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 1.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.34% | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -43.75% | -18.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JIG and PJFV
Explore further