Screener
JMOM vs QMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF vs Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
Key differences
- JMOM costs 0.16% less per year.
- JMOM is significantly larger than QMOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JMOM follows a index tracking strategy; QMOM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, JMOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| JMOM | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $519M |
| Since | 2017 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.8% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.1% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.37 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.29% | 23.09% |
| Max drawdown | -34.31% | -39.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JMOM and QMOM
Explore further