Screener
JPAN vs MCH
Matthews Japan Active ETF vs Matthews China Active ETF
Key differences
- JPAN covers asia pacific markets; MCH covers emerging markets.
- JPAN follows a index tracking strategy; MCH uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| JPAN | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $22M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.61% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.4% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.88% | 19.91% |
| Max drawdown | -15.25% | -40.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JPAN and MCH
Explore further