Screener
JPST vs SCUS
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF vs Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF
Key differences
- JPST is significantly larger than SCUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JPST follows a index tracking strategy; SCUS uses active selection.
- JPST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JPST | SCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37.6B | $224M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.32% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.61 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.54% | 0.66% |
| Max drawdown | -3.28% | -0.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JPST and SCUS
Explore further