Screener
JQUA vs ROE
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
Key differences
- JQUA costs 0.37% less per year.
- JQUA is significantly larger than ROE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JQUA follows a index tracking strategy; ROE uses active selection.
- JQUA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JQUA | ROE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.5B | $239M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.5% | +37.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.31% | 14.02% |
| Max drawdown | -32.92% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JQUA and ROE
Explore further