Screener
JUST vs GSGO
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- JUST costs 0.25% less per year.
- JUST is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JUST follows a index tracking strategy; GSGO uses active selection.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JUST | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $550M | $163M |
| Since | 2018 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.03% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.83% | -13.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JUST and GSGO
Explore further