Screener
KARS vs CCNR
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.33% less per year.
- CCNR is significantly larger than KARS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KARS follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
- KARS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KARS | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $101M | $394M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.15% | 2.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.0% | +72.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.80% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -64.85% | -20.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KARS and CCNR
Explore further