Screener
KAT vs AMAX
Scharf ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- KAT costs 0.61% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT is classified as equity, while AMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $60M |
| Since | 2011 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.98% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and AMAX
Explore further