Screener
KAT vs BFLX
Scharf ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.35% less per year.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | — |
| Since | 2011 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | 0.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and BFLX
Explore further