Screener
KAT vs CWS
Scharf ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Key differences
- CWS costs 0.10% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than CWS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $155M |
| Since | 2011 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 0.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -0.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.34% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -33.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and CWS
Explore further