Screener
KAT vs EYEG
Scharf ETF vs AB Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- EYEG costs 0.45% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than EYEG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT is classified as equity, while EYEG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; EYEG uses multi strategy.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | EYEG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $26M |
| Since | 2011 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 4.98% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -4.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and EYEG
Explore further