Screener
KAT vs FNDC
Scharf ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDC costs 0.36% less per year.
- FNDC is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; FNDC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2011 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 3.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.24% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -43.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and FNDC
Explore further