Screener
KAT vs GGM
Scharf ETF vs GGM Macro Alignment ETF
Key differences
- KAT costs 0.19% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than GGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | GGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.94% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $18M |
| Since | 2011 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.32% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -19.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and GGM
Explore further