Screener
KAT vs GIGB
Scharf ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.67% less per year.
- KAT is classified as equity, while GIGB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $907M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.40% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -22.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and GIGB
Explore further