Screener
KAT vs GMUB
Scharf ETF vs Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- GMUB costs 0.57% less per year.
- KAT is classified as equity, while GMUB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | GMUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $263M |
| Since | 2011 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.76% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -3.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and GMUB
Explore further