Screener
KAT vs GSGO
Scharf ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.30% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $163M |
| Since | 2011 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -13.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and GSGO
Explore further