Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

KAT vs GSWO

Scharf ETF vs Goldman Sachs ETF Trust

KAT

Scharf ETF

Scharf Investments

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$688M

GSWO

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust

Annual cost

Fund size

Key differences

  • KAT is classified as equity, while GSWO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • KAT follows a active selection strategy; GSWO uses long short.

Side-by-side comparison

KATGSWO
Annual cost (TER)0.75%
Fund size (AUM)$688M
Since2011
Dividend yield0.39%
Asset classequityalternative
Region
Strategyactive selectionlong short
CAGR 1YN/A+21.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+18.5%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.25
Volatility 1Y10.79%
Max drawdown-9.25%-17.77%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to KAT and GSWO