Screener
KAT vs ITOT
Scharf ETF vs iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
Key differences
- ITOT costs 0.72% less per year.
- ITOT is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; ITOT uses index tracking.
- ITOT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | ITOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $88.9B |
| Since | 2011 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 1.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -35.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and ITOT
Explore further