Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

KAT vs MARS

Scharf ETF vs Roundhill Space & Technology ETF

KAT

Scharf ETF

Scharf Investments

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$688M

MARS

Roundhill Space & Technology ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$29M

Key differences

  • KAT is significantly larger than MARS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

KATMARS
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.75%
Fund size (AUM)$688M$29M
Since20112026
Dividend yield0.39%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1YN/AN/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y
Max drawdown-9.25%-13.96%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to KAT and MARS