Screener
KAT vs MTBA
Scharf ETF vs Simplify MBS ETF
Key differences
- MTBA costs 0.60% less per year.
- KAT is classified as equity, while MTBA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; MTBA uses multi strategy.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | MTBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2011 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 5.53% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.11% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -3.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and MTBA
Explore further