Screener
KAT vs SCHX
Scharf ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHX costs 0.72% less per year.
- SCHX is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; SCHX uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | SCHX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $68.2B |
| Since | 2011 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 1.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -34.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and SCHX
Explore further