Screener
KAT vs ZHOG
Scharf ETF vs F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
Key differences
- ZHOG costs 0.32% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than ZHOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT is classified as equity, while ZHOG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | ZHOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $45M |
| Since | 2011 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 5.60% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.61% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -3.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and ZHOG
Explore further