Screener
KAUG vs ISCV
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- ISCV costs 0.73% less per year.
- ISCV is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAUG is classified as alternative, while ISCV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KAUG follows a structured outcome strategy; ISCV uses index tracking.
- ISCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAUG | ISCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $80M | $651M |
| Since | 2024 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.90% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.09% | 16.48% |
| Max drawdown | -15.66% | -51.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAUG and ISCV
Explore further