Screener
KAUG vs PSI
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August vs Invesco Semiconductors ETF
Key differences
- PSI costs 0.23% less per year.
- PSI is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAUG is classified as alternative, while PSI is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KAUG follows a structured outcome strategy; PSI uses index tracking.
- PSI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAUG | PSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $80M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.06% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +195.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +58.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +32.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.09% | 37.31% |
| Max drawdown | -15.66% | -44.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAUG and PSI
Explore further