Screener
KAUG vs RFV
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.44% less per year.
- RFV is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAUG is classified as alternative, while RFV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KAUG follows a structured outcome strategy; RFV uses index tracking.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAUG | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $80M | $313M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.09% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -15.66% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAUG and RFV
Explore further