Screener
KDRN vs AGZ
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs iShares Agency Bond ETF
Key differences
- AGZ costs 0.42% less per year.
- AGZ is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KDRN | AGZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $552M |
| Since | 2021 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 3.75% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 2.61% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -11.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KDRN and AGZ
Explore further