Screener
KDRN vs FBND
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs Fidelity Total Bond ETF
Key differences
- FBND costs 0.26% less per year.
- FBND is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KDRN | FBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $25.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 3.90% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -17.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KDRN and FBND
Explore further