Screener
KDRN vs GTOQ
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTOQ costs 0.23% less per year.
- GTOQ is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KDRN is classified as fixed income, while GTOQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KDRN follows a index tracking strategy; GTOQ uses multi strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, GTOQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KDRN | GTOQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $162M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 6.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 3.76% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -15.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KDRN and GTOQ
Explore further