Screener
KDRN vs HYFI
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs AB High Yield ETF
Key differences
- HYFI costs 0.22% less per year.
- HYFI is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KDRN follows a index tracking strategy; HYFI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, HYFI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HYFI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KDRN | HYFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $334M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 6.79% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 3.98% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -6.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KDRN and HYFI
Explore further