Screener
KEAT vs BGRO
Keating Active ETF vs iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF
Key differences
- BGRO costs 0.30% less per year.
- KEAT is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KEAT is classified as equity, while BGRO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEAT | BGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $9M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.23% | 18.04% |
| Max drawdown | -7.45% | -24.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEAT and BGRO
Explore further